I. Objective
|
Original paragraph
|
Paraphrase result
|
|
The
researcher’s investigation of his/her own internal thought processes at the
same time as he/she is taking a test.
|
This study research about his/her own
internal thought processes at once time when he/she is taking a test.
|
II. Methodology
a. Participant
|
Original paragraph
|
Paraphrase result
|
|
The
only subject of this study was the researcher himself.
|
There was one participant of this study was only the researcher.
|
b. Data collection
|
Original paragraph
|
Paraphrase result
|
|
The
research and measurement tools used in this study were 11 cloze tests. The
cloze tests, with the deletion rate of every 7th word, were made
from the researcher’s previous writings which ranged from three months to one
year old. Another person was instructed to make cloze tests form extracts
that the researcher had already selected so as not to contain much quoted
material. To allow what is called lead-in and lead-out, the first and the
last sentences of each passage were left intact. The cloze tests constructed
varied in length: while the shortest cloze test contained 34 items, the
longest had 53 blanks.
|
The research and measurement tools in this research consist of 11
cloze tests. The cloze tests, will be
delete every 7th word, it made from the writing’s researcher
before, which turn from three months to one year old. Another person was
commanded to make the form of cloze tests which the researcher had already
choosed so not too much contain of copy the material. To possible what the
meaning of lead-in and lead-out, One and the ending sentence from each
passage were full. The cloze tests had already building varied in length: for
the shortest of cloze tests consist of 34 items, and the longest was 53
blanks.
|
III. Main Finding
|
Original paragraph
|
Paraphrase result
|
|
As
a result of his dissatisfaction with criterion-validation in language-testing
and particularly in cloze testing where attempts of content-validation and
construct validation have been in vain because it is not at all clear what
cloze tests are measuring, the present researcher suggests a new validation
technique, called ‘researcher research’,
|
The final of his disstisfaction with criterion validation in
language-testing and especially for measuring of cloze tests which efforts of
content-validation and repair validation is useless as it caused by not clear
what the cloze tests measuring, this study show new validation technique,
named ‘researcher-research’,
|
IV. Conclusion
|
Original paragraph
|
Paraphrase result
|
|
The
validation technique presented here is not intended for use with cloze tests
only. ‘Researcher research’ can guide the researcher in finding out whether
other tests intended to measure reading and listening comprehension or to
test knowledge of vocabulary and grammar appropriately serve what they are
intended to. The evidence 93 such produced may be combined with other
qualitative and quantitative data to support the validity of a test for a
particular purpose.
|
The validation technique held that is not mean with cloze tests
only. ‘researcher-research’ can guide
the researcher what the other tests can be measurement reading, and
listening comprehension or can test a knowledge of vocabulary and grammar
exactly. The proof of that 93 produced can combined with other qualitative
and quantitative data as support of validity of test to part of goal.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment